Removals of random stuff is hindering discourse, such as it is

A commenter posted some gibberish about Evolution in my subreddit. Someone replied to that. The original commenter then posted the following:

> Your acting like you have a proven the theory.

> Your argument rests on three assumptions: (1) gradual selection solves probability, (2) abiogenesis is irrelevant, and (3) interdependence is just physics. But gradual selection can't select what doesn't work; abiogenesis is the foundation of evolution, not a side issue; and interdependence is functional, not just physical. The Cambrian shows sudden complexity, not gradual change. And imperfections don't disprove design—they prove a broken world. So the question remains: Where did the information come from?

That's more gibberish, and yes I see the em dash, but there is nothing *wrong* with it, right?

It was removed without explanation by Reddit. Not the "[ Removed by Reddit ]" bad AI out of control kind of removal where someone is warned for nothing, but the kind where it was just removed, like a moderator can, but with no "removed by", often characterized as a "spam filter" removal.

What is up with this? Can it please stop?

And telling me that the solution is to approve them manually doesn't help, there are hundreds of them, we can't possibly see them all since the only way we notice them is to just come across them in the wild, and we come across them all in a timely way.